2010-2019
Standardisation, collaboration, and system integration
What was happening
This decade focused on consistency, clear governance, and using evidence in routine care.
Contents |
BACCN milestones
- Greater influence in national standards and advisory groups
- Expansion of education frameworks and leadership development
- Wider engagement through digital platforms, including Facebook (2010), Twitter (2011), and Instagram (2018)
- Introduction of member research funding opportunities
- Partnership with NIHR RDN as a non‑commercial partner
Key policy and system milestones
- Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine established (2010): https://www.ficm.ac.uk/aboutusaboutthefaculty/history-of-the-ficm
- National Early Warning Score (NEWS) introduced (2011), updated to NEWS2 (2017): https://www.rcp.ac.uk/media/a4ibkkbf/news2-final-report_0_0.pdf
- National competency frameworks and education standards introduced from 2012 onwards
- UK Critical Care Nursing Alliance (UKCCNA) established (2013): https://www.ficm.ac.uk/ukccna
- Care Quality Commission inspections extended to critical care (2013)
- Core Standards for Intensive Care Units published (2013): https://ics.ac.uk/resource/core-standards-for-icus.html
- GPICS V1 published, setting national expectations for ICU services (2015)
- NICE NG94 on acute and emergency care pathways (2018): https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng94
Key frameworks, standards, and guidance
- National Standards for Critical Care Nurse Education Version 1 (2012)
- CC3N National Competency Framework for Adult Critical Care Nurses (2012, updated 2015 and beyond)
- Outreach standards and competencies (2012)
- Visiting guidance for adult critical care (2012): https://www.baccn.org/static/uploads/resources/BACCN_visiting_doc_2012_v5a_2.pdf
- Development of advanced practice roles and competency frameworks supported at national level
- Specialty competency frameworks, including trauma (2017), enhanced care (2018), and liver (2019):
https://www.cc3n.org.uk/uploads/9/8/4/2/98425184/step_1_trauma_competencies.pdf
https://www.cc3n.org.uk/uploads/9/8/4/2/98425184/01_new_step_1_final__1_.pdf
https://www.cc3n.org.uk/uploads/9/8/4/2/98425184/liver_comps_final_aug_2019.pdf
How frameworks improved training
Frameworks made training more structured and consistent.
- Clear expectations: Defined what competence looks like at each level, making assessment fair and transparent
- National consistency: Training aligned across the UK, improving workforce mobility and trust in capability
- Structured pathways: Step-based progression supported career development and retention
- Practice-based learning: Focus on real clinical skills, with supervised practice and evidence of competence
- Better support for educators: Shared standards improved supervision and sign-off decisions
- Alignment with service needs: Training matched standards such as GPICS, ensuring staff were prepared for real service demands
- Recognition of advanced roles: Frameworks supported safer development of specialist and advanced practice roles
This moved training from local variation to a more reliable and transferable system.
Research, reports, and publications
- NCEPOD reports shaping care:
- Knowing the Risk (2011): https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2011poc.html
- On the Right Trach? (2014): https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2014tc.html
- Sepsis: Just Say Sepsis (2015): https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2015sepsis.html
- Acute Non‑Invasive Ventilation: Inspiring Change (2017): https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2017niv.html
- History of intensive care (2011): https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2721
- TracMan trial influencing tracheostomy practice (2013)
- Rapid Assessment of the Acutely Ill Patient (2013)
- Critical Care Manual of Clinical Procedures and Competencies (2013)
- Ongoing research through the NICC Journal
Collaboration and leadership
UK Critical Care Nursing Alliance (UKCCNA)
The UKCCNA brought together six national critical care nursing organisations, including BACCN. Its purpose was to create a single, coordinated voice for the profession.
In practice, it:
- aligned responses to national policy and consultations
- presented consistent positions on workforce, education, and standards
- strengthened nursing influence within national forums linked to FICM and wider system work
- supported collaboration across regions and specialties
This reduced fragmentation. Instead of multiple organisations speaking separately, there was a more unified national position.
The alliance also supported leadership development. It created opportunities for senior nurses to contribute to national programmes, advisory groups, and strategy. This helped strengthen nursing visibility at system level.
Alongside this, the Critical Care Leadership Forum (2013) provided a space for shared discussion and alignment across organisations.
Impact of GPICS V1 (2015)
GPICS V1 set a clear national benchmark for intensive care services.
Its impact was practical:
- Defined expectations: A single standard for staffing, organisation, and governance reduced variation
- Workforce clarity: Clear expectations for staffing and skill mix supported planning and business cases
- Stronger focus on safety: Requirements such as nurse-to-patient ratios made safety measurable
- Regulatory alignment: CQC inspections used GPICS as a reference point, giving the standards weight
- Multidisciplinary working: It formalised the role of the wider team, including AHPs and outreach services
- Service development: Used to design ICU expansion, outreach, and follow-up services
It linked workforce, safety, and quality in a way services could demonstrate and evidence.
What changed in practice
- Training and competencies became standardised across the UK
- Inspection and audit strengthened quality assurance
- Career pathways became clearer and more structured
- Early warning systems and evidence-based tools were used more consistently
- Multidisciplinary working became more defined and embedded
Decade summary
BACCN helped embed consistency across critical care nursing. Frameworks strengthened training, UKCCNA strengthened collaboration, and GPICS set clear service expectations. Together, these changes created a more aligned, accountable, and structured model of care.


